When I first began with ActionCOACH, one of my first tasks was to oversee the rebranding of the company from Action International to ActionCOACH.
We did a lot of work to finally decide on the new company name, logo and colors, surveying 100,000 business owners and letting them choose the company’s new image.

I don’t believe in focus groups and we didn’t use them for our rebrand for a number of reasons.
Participants often try to please the moderator or the other members of the group, so they may hold back or say what they think others want to hear rather than give their real opinion.
Companies have less control over focus groups than they do over a one on one interview, where they can ask focused questions and get real answers.
A focus group is a small group. I chose to find out opinions and hedge my bets by talking to a target audience of 100,000.
“They (focus groups) just ensure that you don’t offend anyone and produce bland, inoffensive products,” Apple’s Senior Vice President of Industrial Design, Jonathan Ive says and I think he’s on the mark.
A big part of rebranding is the company’s new logo but typically logos are designed by creative people who aren’t necessarily interested in creating the best logo or design for generating leads or sales.
Instead they want to create something that feeds their inner artist and many businesses have lost a lot of money by doing just that. Award-winning logos that nobody connects with and don’t stimulate people to buy happens when art wins out over proper research.
Ideally, rebranding is done to build recognition and better connect with a company’s customer base and target market. But too often rebranding seems to be nothing more than an excuse to undertake another project, or, to put it bluntly, busy work.
The latest company to undertake a major rebranding that is completely underwhelming is Seattle’s Best coffee.
Seattle’s Best is in a difficult position because they are owned by the same parent company that owns Starbucks, so they are competing for wallet share within the same four walls as one of its biggest competitors.
So how do you build a brand when you’re in that position? They began by naming Michelle Gass President.
Gass is no stranger to the corporation as she had been brand manager and global strategy chief at Starbucks. Her goal was to bring focus to Seattle’s Best, which hadn’t been performing as expected.
Gass has made some significant changes to the brand, including separating the five basic styles of coffee the company sells into numbered packaging to help explain the differences between them to customers.

But if you look closer at the new packaging, you will see their new logo, which I simply don’t like. I know I can’t be the only one that looks at that logo and wants to donate blood.
You can find plenty of other people who don’t like the new look by just looking for Seattle’s Best on Amazon. Included among the comments were two that stood out to me.
“Seattle’s Best has obviously been taken over by idiots. That’s the only explanation for this new change in product look… Are they trying to market coffee to grade school children? The new product presentation in bright colored, ugly bags with huge numbers on them is so unsophisticated and juvenile that it boggles the mind as to how this piece of rubbish got rubber-stamped by any executive who loves coffee,” said one comment.
Meanwhile, another brought back visions of one of the greatest rebranding fiascos in history, saying, “…it makes me wonder if corporate is purposely trying to kill off SBC (Seattle’s Best Coffee) or create a media fiasco like Coca-Cola did with ‘New Coke’ in the 80′s.”
As you can see, the new logo is sterile and simple and who, exactly is it supposed to appeal to? Is it a logo for a premium brand or does the logo and new packaging make the brand look like any generic brand one finds at the local supermarket?

“People don’t drink no-name colas,” Gass said, “But lots of people drink no-name coffee. That’s because no one’s come in and said, ‘Don’t accept a bad cup of coffee’.”
I find that statement perplexing to say the least, especially when the new look is generic and has removed the traditional aspect from the look and feel of the brand.
(Also, I don’t believe people choose no-name coffees. We ran out of a premium brand at our office recently and my team definitely knew they weren’t drinking the good stuff.)
Rather than a new logo, I think Seattle’s Best needs to find a better way to differentiate itself from Starbucks and other major coffee brands.
Brands, especially food retail brands, need to concentrate on brand experience as much as taste profiling.
In Australia, coffee shops are influenced by European cafes. You can go there to eat a real meal and even take a client there. There don’t seem to be many places like that in America and that would seem to be a perfect niche for Seattle’s Best. In fact, McDonalds is testing this with their McCafe line of coffees.
So rather than changing what was an effective and attractive logo, change the customer’s experience at Seattle’s Best.