Posts tagged: profits

Focus On Profit Before Growth- Part Two

By expanding your brand too quickly, you dilute it, but if you narrow your brand, focus on what you do well and do it better than anyone else, your brand, and your profits, will grow.

This is made crystal clear by looking at the story of Google and Alta Vista.

For those of you that don’t know what Alta Vista is, it was one of the original internet search engines. As we know today from Google, a company can make a lot of money by just providing a search engine. But Alta Vista wanted to do more. They expanded to email, forum boards and even online shopping.

Today, Alta Vista is a search engine that has little to no relevance and its other aspects are virtually worthless, but Google is one of the most profitable companies in the world. Alta Vista looked to expand and they lost sight of why people found them in the first place. They filled needs that people weren’t as interested in and they lost the opportunity to become the leader in a growth market if they’d just stayed focused on what they did best, search engines.

Google, meanwhile, focused on their search engine and made it the industry standard. In fact, the word Google is synonymous with an internet search so much that I tell someone on my team to “Google it” everyday.

After Google perfected its search engine it moved on to other aspects of its business, including email, but their brand wasn’t diluted because they mastered what they did best before moving onto the next thing.

There are literally thousands of examples of businesses struggling after expanding, including two well known restaurant franchises, Baja Fresh and Krispy Kreme.

In 2003, Wendy’s bought Baja Fresh when it was steadily growing in 2002 for a reported $275 million. They began to expand quickly and a little over a year later, same store sales numbers began to drop.

They suffered a 4.6% drop in 2003 followed by a 6.4% drop in 2004. Wendy’s eventually sold Baja Fresh to private investors for only $31 million in 2006, losing hundreds of millions of dollars in the process. Baja Fresh is only now beginning to recover, albeit slowly.

Krispy Kreme was one of the hottest brands in the United States a few years ago but once the company went public, they began to expand very quickly. The company diluted its cult status by opening dozens of locations and licensing donuts to grocery stores and gas stations.

Within just a few years many of the franchised units were forced to close as the company’s profits drastically declined. The brand still hasn’t reached the same level it enjoyed before expansion.

What do these examples tell us?

If a business does something, it should do it well, but expanding too quickly means the business will have to deal with issues it probably isn’t prepared for.

Consistency suffers, and valued customers don’t have the same experience they did before the expansion, leading to a less profitable business and more challenges to overcome.

So how can you avoid this pitfall?

If you are running a profitable business don’t bite off more than you can chew. Stick with what you do and do it as well as anyone. Then provide outstanding service to your customers and make sure they know you are the source in your industry.

When you decide to expand, whether it’s selling different lines, opening new stores or anything in between, you must be sure you understand the possible challenges you will face and have plans for how to deal with them, just as you did when you opened your original business.

When you understand the pitfalls your business may face when you expand, you’ll be better prepared to deal with them. The leaders at Alta Vista, Baja Fresh, Krispy Kreme and thousands of other businesses didn’t understand this and their brands suffered. Don’t let it happen to you.

Does Business Coaching Work? Check the Numbers

We know business coaching works. We see it every day, in the success stories of our clients, and even the successes of our coaches that use those same principles to run their businesses.

But for some who haven’t experienced coaching, objections still abound. Often these people see putting money toward coaching as an expense rather than an investment.

But we have definitive studies that prove that coaching provides a terrific return on investment for businesses.

In fact, businesses that have been coached by an ActionCOACH Business Coach have seen a return of $7.50 for every dollar they invested. If you knew you could get that kind of return on your investment, wouldn’t you do it straight away?

So where did we come up with those numbers?

Our terrific Florida ML’s, Nick and Arcelia Dove commissioned a study of their clients by a financial analyst.

The study showed that the team in Florida not only proved a return of 7.5 to one, but they also helped their clients increase revenues by 79% and grow profits by 106%.

By any measure, these figures are outstanding and proof that working with world class ActionCOACH business coaches can help any business grow revenue and profits.

So if you’re looking to grow your business, what is the best option?

With our Guarantee and this evidence supporting the power of business coaching, there is nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Are You Nominated for the Business Excellence Awards?

The Business Excellence Forum will take place on August 19 and 20.

The Forum will feature the Business Excellence Awards Ceremony, which will honor some of the best companies and entrepreneurs in the world of small business on Saturday August 20.

Awards will be given in 19 categories ranging from Most Innovative Company to Entrepreneur of the Year.

If you know a business that has done a terrific job in 2010, it couldn’t be easier to nominate them.

Just click here and follow the instructions and nominate your business today.

Business Coaches Are the Big Winners at 2010 EMEA Conference

At ActionCOACH, we believe in results and rewarding people when they achieve outstanding results. This philosophy helps make us the leader in the world of business coaching today.

The 2010 EMEA Conference took place at the Sheraton Skyline in London, England. At the awards ceremony, dozens of coaches were honored, signifying their achievements throughout 2010.

The award winners were:

Coach of the Year: Shweta Jhajharia

Rookie Coach of the Year: Kent Rhodes

Most Improved Coach: John Cottrell

Best Client Results: Neale Lewis

Best Awarded Client: Parag Prasad

Best Client Retention: Peter Boolkah

ProfitCLUB Award: Stuart Johnson

ActionCLUB Award: Rene de Murard

GrowthCLUB Award: Pascale Joly

Coaches’ Choice ActionCOACH: Hayley Erner

Coaches’ Choice AbundanceCOACH: Kevin Stansfield

Coaches’ Choice SeminarCOACH: Jas Darar

Coaches’ Choice NetworkCOACH: Stuart Johnson

Coaches’ Choice BrandCOACH: Eric Hilario

Coaches’ Choice MarketingCOACH: Gil Devlin

Coaches’ Choice SalesCOACH: Shweta Jhajharia

Coaches’ Choice TeamCOACH: Tim Rylatt

Coaches’ Choice Forum Poster of the Year: Christina Jackson

ActionMAN Awards:
Andrew Kureishy
Stephen Unwin
Mike McGuire
Tony Hoskins
Richard Cullen
Derek O’Dwyer
Simon Williams
Nigel Jew
Graham Corrigan
Roger Pemberton
Humphrey Sherwood
Andy Sleet
Ryan Veal
Gary Mullins

Congratulations to all the winners and we are looking forward to what each and every one of you accomplish in 2011.

Don’t Miss Out on the iPhone “5 Ways” App

How has ActionCOACH made its name in the business coaching industry?

We’ve done it by teaching businesses how to be profitable. It was with this in mind that we produced our new “5 Ways” app for the iPhone.

There are “5 Ways” any business can become profitable, and when you understand how each “way” drives profit, you are setting yourself up for incredible success.

With the “5 Ways” app, you can see how to multiply profits in your business by increasing each of the “5 Ways” incrementally.

And since you can use the app on the go or whenever is important, you’ll never have to make a decision while questioning your numbers again.

The “5 Ways” is one of the most important things ActionCOACH teaches its clients, so don’t miss out on this app for your iPhone any longer.

Download it now and get on your way to profits…

Big Business Practices Put Small Businesses in Holding Pattern- Part 3

InBev is not alone. The majority of Fortune 100 companies have taken to paying their suppliers well after the 30 days that used to be the norm.

So what does this all mean for small businesses and the nation’s recovery as a whole?

Until there is some noise about this topic it will continue to go as an unnoticed reason the economy won’t rebound.

For all the talk we hear in the media, the key reason small businesses have seen a lack of cashflow and dearth of hiring is the fact that they can’t get paid on time.

Think of how much easier it would be for small businesses to take advantage of opportunities and expand if they were paid 30 days after issuing a invoice rather than 60, 90 or 120 days.

But what can be done to protect small businesses from this practice?

In my opinion, it’s time for the government to step in, especially if they want to see a real recovery from the recession.

After all, who can protect the millions of small businesses from the practices of big businesses?

To me this seems like another instance of the government not truly understanding the needs of small businesses and their importance to the economy as a whole.

Big Business Practices Put Small Businesses in Holding Pattern- Part 2

If they are already profitable, why are big businesses holding up the payment cycle?

It just makes good business sense and because it does, it has become the industry norm.

After all, if your business could lay capital costs at the feet of your suppliers you’d do it, wouldn’t you?

Of course you would. This practice increases profitability and the overall value of a company because it turns a supplier’s resources into capital for the original company.

For instance, look at InBev, the Belgian company that bought Anheuser-Busch a few years ago.

In 2009, InBev went to a Net 120 payment system.

According to CEO Carlos Brito, “We always say, the leaner the business, the more money we’ll have at the end of the year to share.” And it’s incredibly easy to run a leaner business when you have your suppliers tying up their own capital for the sake of your business.

When he wrote about this issue in 2009, Steve McKee of Advertising Age said, “By forcing other companies to finance its operations, InBev is tying up capital that doesn’t belong to it. That hinders those companies’ ability to invest in innovation — not to mention meet their monthly payrolls. InBev is stealing their futures, plain and simple.”

Big Business Practices Put Small Businesses in Holding Pattern- Part 1

We all know recovery from the recession isn’t happening as quickly as we’d like it and there are various reasons given as to what is holding it up.

Banks aren’t lending, the government doesn’t understand how to build economic growth or health care costs are too high.

All of these are valid points, but the economy isn’t growing because small businesses simply aren’t hiring.

The 20 million small businesses in the United States account for about 60 percent of jobs created, but small business growth, along with job growth has been stagnant.

Blame can be laid at the factors just mentioned, but the basic reason small businesses aren’t hiring is they lack cashflow. This comes down to an important issue, and one that hasn’t garnered a lot of press but could be the key to the recovery.

Many big businesses have gone from a Net 30 payment system to a Net 60, 90, or even 120 system. This simply means that instead of paying suppliers 30 days after receiving an invoice, the billing cycle for most big companies takes at least 60 and in a growing number of cases, up to 120 days.

Jeffrey Leonard writes in the Washington Monthly, “While large companies sit on mountains of cash, small businesses struggle to maintain lines of working capital, to pay their creditors in thirty days, and to meet payroll every two weeks—all while waiting two months or more after sending out an invoice to get paid themselves. Multiply this by millions of small firms and you have another piece of the missing-jobs puzzle.”

No credit … cash only! (Otherwise known as “Swipe Fees Part 2”) …

Here’s more on how “swipe fees” can really add up for a business, and how many companies (like high end restaurants) simply won’t take plastic anymore …

Swipe fees … (part 2) …

Note also how some of those fees can end up costing more for companies than health insurance, and you can see the importance of knowing all of your numbers, all of the time.

However …

Before you go and cancel out all of your merchant agreements with the credit card companies, you should also take into account the opportunity costs of your customers NOT having the ability to pay with plastic.

For some businesses, it might make sense to raise prices to cover the cost of the fees, instead of taking away from customers the ability to stretch their purchasing power literally at the point of purchase.

Again, your decisions should be based on your numbers AND the growth potential of your current business, customer base and resources.

It’s always better to find ways to grow your top line and bottom line versus cutting expenses.

So while it might make sense for certain companies to see how “swipe fees” may or may not be impacting their profits, it also makes sense to see how a few percentage points of growth in some key drivers in your business can make more difference than saving those points on the expense side.

And you can see for yourself how that can work for you and your business at this link right here …

5 Ways iPhone app

Jodie Shaw

Cashflow or profits?

In our last post we looked at the importance of generating leads over “building a brand” …

Now, for a more financially-oriented question:  What’s more vital initially for your business … cashflow or profit?

Hmmm …

We’ll tackle this one in a later post …

Jodie Shaw